Search for: "State v. English" Results 2461 - 2480 of 6,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2024, 6:36 pm by Joe Rosenbaum
In plain English, the order lifts the injunction imposed by the District Court. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
That development is important not merely for its internal effects but for what it might offer to other states as a model of legitimating constitutionalism (and the construction of constitutional states) that  varies in fundamental respects from the forms and expression of constitutionalism and the construction of constitutional states in the West. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:00 am by gmlevine
Domain names whole or in part similar to a trademark only become confusing when they confuse the “objective bystander” as the concurring in part Panel stated in Open Society Institute v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 3:00 am by Xandra Kramer
The foundation also stated that Vattenfall abused the inaction of some of its customers after a new annual offer. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court decision in Texas v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court being held in a 7-2 decision (Justice Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts dissenting),Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 7:09 pm
Madison 1804 Napoleon’s Code civil 1857 Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:42 am by Bartolus
415/05 P Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission [2008] ECR I? [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
 Although there is no international framework on the requirement of fixation, in English law the work has to be fixed in some material form, such as a film. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
As regards the forgery, the judge stated, in that very restrained and understated way in which English judges express emotion: ... the best that can be said about this purported letter is that for several reasons no one would take it seriously... [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
” Finally, the Referee stated the Skype protocol was vastly superior to testimony by speaker phone which had been permitted in another case (Superior Sales & Salvage v. [read post]