Search for: "State v. L. B. T."
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
Then there’s the trader who uses the mark in Country B—potential consumer deception. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 12:03 pm
L’anza Research Int’l, Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
Edward B. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:03 pm
Bank couldn’t leave good enough alone and wanted to take attorney’s fees onto its claim under § 506(b). [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm
Nat'l Bank of Jackson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:52 pm
See Lewis v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
(b) Appropriate the property to his or her own use or to the use of any person not entitled to the use of the property.11 Copyright opponents such as Falkvinge appear to have a greatly attenuated understanding of what property is and what it means to deprive someone of that property. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:27 am
State, Dep’t of Personnel, 389 N.J. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Cadbury Adams USA LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) State Tort claim preempted by patent claim where pleading of bad faith did not meet Iqbal standards: Viskase Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am
Disease Burden from Viral Hepatitis A, B, and C in the United States. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
Michel and John T. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
The Delaware lawyers who appear in a case are responsible to the Court for the case and its presentation. b. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
The diverging approaches of the majority and the dissenters in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
The pertinent language states that “[t]he privilege may be claimed by the person who owns the trade secret . . . [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:38 am
§ 1115(b). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:19 am
& Lee L. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
S/he doesn't have to. [read post]
