Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:29 am
" Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the UK (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaqonly a provisional conclusion). [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
The IPKat's resident expert in the affairs of the higher echelons of the British judiciary informs him that litigation in the UK in the honest concurrent use dispute of Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnick v Anheuser-Busch Inc (noted by the IPKat here) is not going any further. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:03 pm
Optical Disc Drives, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-897 (ITC July 30, 2014, Order) (Lord, ALJ). [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
Last month a three-judge panel consisting of Lords Neuberger, Reed and Carnwath refused leave to appeal, stating: "Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal". [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
Managing Intellectual Property had a bit of a scoop this week, picking up very quickly on the news that Lord Younger of Leckie, the current Minister for Intellectual Property in the United Kingdom, announced that his government had no plans to introduce an IP Tsar along the lines of the apparently successful Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm
In true anecdotal style, the author explains the relevance of Section 115 of the Indian statute (appointment of scientific advisors) by pointing out the open expression of gratitude by Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am
Current TPP negotiation member states are the United States, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
The apparent contradiction within the House of Lords’ decision might be explained by the numerous Turkish cases they cite: Karaduman v Turkey (1993) 74 DR 93, Kalaç v Turkey (1997) 27 EHRR 552, and most importantly, Sahin v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 8, which was heard before the ECtHR. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
Hardly ever has the voice of the timorous spoken more clearly and loudly than in these words of Lord Davey in Janson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
Tessa Jowell complained to the PCC about an article in the Daily Mail which stated that Jowell had been criticised by the Cabinet Secretary in 2006 over an alleged payment to her husband by Silvio Berlusconi. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
The new Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett, gave his first press conference [pdf] on 5 December 2017. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am
Our digital Lord Chamberlain would commandeer that capability at one remove,ES. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:02 am
Adopting the maxim that things are more fun in pairs, the Court of Appeal yesterday handed down not one, but two judgments in the Virgin Atlantic aircraft seating cases: Virgin Atlantic Airways v Delta Air Lines [2011] EWCA Civ 162; and Virgin Atlantic Airways v Premium Aircraft Interiors [2011] EWCA Civ 163. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm
In last week's opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 11:28 am
Rotkiske states that he had no knowledge of the proceeding and therefore failed to appear. [read post]
