Search for: "State v. Public Service Commission"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 4,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm
Hilltop Group, Inc., et al v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Immediately upon publication of the Rule on June 29, 2015, the majority of states filed actions challenging the validity of the Rule. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
Department of State. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 10:26 am
v=-JL7Wrwj9dg; and https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/3F95E49183E6F8AF85257FD200505A3A/%24file/15-1063-1619173.pdf. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 7:04 am
v=-JL7Wrwj9dg; and https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/3F95E49183E6F8AF85257FD200505A3A/%24file/15-1063-1619173.pdf. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
Supreme Court’s March 2018 decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:01 am
Bianchi v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:20 pm
In return for its services under the Origination Agreement, Legacy was entitled to receive a commission for each policy purchased on behalf of Greenwich Life. . . . [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission approved the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Rule 6100. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:40 pm
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 11:35 am
Public Law No 115-385. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
See, e.g., Zeran v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
Seyfarth Synopsis: As profiled in our recent publication of the 13th Annual Workplace Class Action Litigation Report, the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:04 am
Circuit in NAB v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:20 am
It was not about quotas v. merit. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
The fact that some digital assets are commodities while others are securities has led to unnecessary confusion within the private and public sector. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm
Orkin Services of California, Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern Division of the Central District of California denied the employer's petition to compel the plaintiff former employee to arbitrate his claims, including his claims for penalties under PAGA on the ground the PAGA waiver contained in an arbitration agreement the former employee signed at the outset of his employment is unconscionable because it is contrary to California public … [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
” In Beckles v. [read post]
