Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 2461 - 2480 of 16,386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Gender violence happens no matter what the circumstances are, including all the harms that were increased by the pandemic.I always teach United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:23 pm by Ana Popovich
The film festival, hosted by news organization 100Reporters and now in its seventh year, kicked off with a screening of Sonia Kennebeck’s documentary “United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
--The Secretary of State shall make each report submitted under this subsection available to the public on the internet website of the Department of State. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 9:40 am by Cannabis Law Group
Ultimately, the idea is to ensure there are strong incentives for companies to operate efficiently, keep prices down, keep quality up, and play fairly. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 2:58 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
United States as amicus curiae Jonathan Ellis, assistant to the solicitor general, argued for the United States in support of Thompson. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:56 am by Ronald Mann
ShareWednesday’s argument in Babcock v Kijakazi will take the justices deep into the intersection of the Social Security Act and a host of statutes defining the obligations and compensation of National Guard workers. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Source: Methodology derived from Council on State Taxation, “50-State Study and Report on Telecommunications Taxation,” May 2005; updated July 2021 from state statutes, FCC data, and local ordinances by Scott Mackey, Leonine Public Affairs LLP, Montpelier, VT. [read post]
Ga.)); Bring a complaint in California federal court along with Attorneys General from six states (claims made by five states based on pendent jurisdiction dismissed in FTC v. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 1:21 pm by Giles Peaker
In my judgment the reasoning of the House of Lords in Fahia (R v Harrow LBC, ex p Fahia(1998) 1 WLR 1396, HL) provides no basis for that contention, nor did the Court of Appeal in Begum (R. v. [read post]