Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 2461 - 2480 of 49,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2007, 9:09 pm
:We also find reversible error in the trial court's almost continuous interference, during cross examination of the People's witnesses, in defense counsel's exploration of issues relevant to defendant's intent to sell (see People v Canto, 31 AD3d 312 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 900 [2006]; People v Melendez, 31 AD3d 186 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 927 [2006]; People v Retamozzo, 25 AD3d 73 [2005]; People v… [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm by Dan Flynn
“In rejecting Bayer’s effort to reverse jury verdicts for harming people with its cancer-causing weed killer glyphosate, the Supreme Court is preventing the company from running roughshod over the environment and public health, poisoning people and flaunting health and safety laws while EPA regulators shrug off the rule of law,” said Jay Feldman, executive director of Beyond Pesticides. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
However, as beneficial as these ART options may be, there are other barriers to creating that family; in South Africa, these barriers include unequal access to treatment, as well as workplace laws and policies that dissuade and discourage people from seeking treatment. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am by Jon
Supreme Court announced its decision today in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 1:28 pm
In People v Harvey, 2008 NY Slip Op 10329 [4th Dept 12/31/08] the Fourth Department reversed defendant's convictions for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [former (2)]) and reckless endangerment in the first degree ( § 120.25) because the court erred in admitting in evidence the preliminary hearing testimony of the victim. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 6:43 pm by Brian Shiffrin
A conviction for driving while intoxicated was reversed in People v Rose (__AD3d __, 2009 NY Slip Op 08412 [4th Dept 11/13/09]) where the stop was baed on what the officer's bleief that he had witnesses a violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law,based on mistaken interpretation of the law. [read post]