Search for: "US v. London"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm
Title: Robinson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
The IAPP also notes that London Islington Council is being investigated for the practice of requiring payment data via email. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Certain Underwriters of Lloyd’s, London 15-456Issue: Whether the Court should overrule Thermtron Products, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
Please let us know if you are aware of any. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:55 am
Bush v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
In the field of individual rights that attitude is captured in the generous rendering of public use which was endorsed unanimously in Hawaiian Housing Authority v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am
Yes, open banking is nothing new to the US. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am
Please let us know whether there is anything else we should add. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
City University London. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
They seek to sustain their strong ties with us whilesimultaneously building stronger ties with China. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
City University London. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:17 am
Anyway, the CLA has an exciting seminar coming up next Wednesday evening at which Henry Carr QC, who represented the famous perfume brands against the smell-alikes in L'Oréal v Bellure, is speaking on the IP/unfair competition aspects of the ECJ's ruling in the comfy climate of Milbank Tweed's London office. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 10:53 am
My other books include The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 5:16 pm
The second concerns a journalist from the Evening Standard who spent a week in 2001 pretending to be a primary school teacher in north London (Munro and Bancroft v Evening Standard). [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm
Their US registration for the logo used on that publication was required to disclaim the word “Physics”. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm
The article uses the recent case involving a monkey taking a selfie to hypothesise using the base principle that the US Copyright Office “will refuse to register a claim if it determines that a human being did not create the work”. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:29 am
Texas) in CM Paula Company v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Co., 185 F.R.D. at 578; see also London–Sire Records, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 5:47 pm
NGK v Google Inc. [read post]
