Search for: "United States v. Breyer"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 9:19 am
., v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:18 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:33 am
But the “standing” issue is currently being decided by the United States Supreme Court in another case from California, Toby Douglas v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 8:33 am
Cargotec sold 203 of those forklifts to customers in Mississippi, about 1.55% of Moffett’s United States sales. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:30 pm
The order simply states that, "The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in these cases expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
United States, in which the state has asked it to overturn the lower courts’ decisions blocking enforcement of four provisions of its controversial immigration law, S.B. 1070. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
Breyer is recused in these cases. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Patchak (Granted )Docket: 11-246Issue(s): (1) Whether the Quiet Title Act and its reservation of the United States' sovereign immunity in suits involving "trust or restricted Indian lands" apply to all suits concerning land in which the United States "claims an interest," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Wednesday’s oral argument in PPL Montana v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:00 am
Briggs (1986) in denying the officers qualified immunity, and whether Malley and United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:21 pm
Government argued as amicus curiae for the perspective of the United States and the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
The most noteworthy point in the argument came almost immediately after Benjamin Horwich rose to argue for the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
Because the United States government prosecuted Mr. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
Breyer. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
Breyer. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
” He suggested that such an interpretation would “expose the United States to expansive damages” – an approach that “Congress would not have taken lightly. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Credit Suisse Securities v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:30 am
The Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts remarked, "this is the strangest statute I have ever seen. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:46 am
Justice Scalia also led off the questioning of Assistant to the Solicitor General Anthony Yang, representing the United States as an amicus in support of Edwards. [read post]
