Search for: "United States v. Felt"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 2,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
This was based upon his analysis of the law of all of the other states. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
” There’s the first rub: The United States Congress felt that Daubert and its progeny, particularly Kumho Tire, somehow strayed from the plain language of Rule 702, so much so that Congress felt the need to amend the Rule “to reflect the changes” in the Rule brought about by the United States Supreme Court in interpreting Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 8:33 pm
Aventis Pharma v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
In Dagher, the parties consolidated their operations in the western United States and agreed to sell gasoline cooperative to downstream purchasers. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:03 am
Bush (2004) and Hamdan v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 10:05 am
Ferguson (1896) that the Constitution permitted state-mandated segregation as long as facilities were "'equal but separate.'" That decision held sway until Brown v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
Think about it this way: minority voters in a city may be 40 percent of the voters in a particular city in Alabama, 25 percent of the voters in the state as a whole, and 12 percent of the voters in the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 12:52 am
In Dagher, the parties consolidated their operations in the western United States and agreed to sell gasoline cooperative to downstream purchasers. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 3:34 am
In Juicy Whip, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:47 pm
Section 1981, passed during Reconstruction, provides that “[a]ll persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right to make and enforce contracts … as enjoyed by white citizens. [read post]
COURT: SIXTH AMENDMENT GIVES DEFENDANT THE RIGHT TO HAVE JURY INFORMED OF MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE
28 May 2008, 7:00 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 8:32 am
In Liu v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:37 pm
Jones, which requires that a defendant direct conduct at a state, intending to cause effects in that state, where some (if not the brunt of) harm will be felt in that state. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:28 am
(See United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
5 May 2008, 2:22 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:20 am
It was not about quotas v. merit. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:58 pm
In fact little or no justification is offered by the Commission for this conclusion.Kerkhoven again arose for consideration, however, within the context of X, Y & Z v United Kingdom (1997). [read post]
