Search for: "v. JONES" Results 2461 - 2480 of 9,905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 7:35 am by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure auction — Abatement of interest on purchase price On July 23, 2014, John Driscoll, III, and three other individuals, acting as substitute trustees (hereinafter “Substitute Trustees”), appellees, filed in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County an Order to Docket Foreclosure/Complaint to Foreclose (hereinafter the “Complaint to Foreclose”) against Kevin Jones, ... [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:24 am by Richard Primus
Twenty years ago, the Supreme Court in Clinton v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Jones, 2017 SCC 60 [1] The appellant, Mr. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:08 pm by Jon Sands
Jones, No. 17-15869 (12-15-17)(Per curiam w/Motz, M. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:37 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 6 December 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal in O’Connor v Bar Standards Board [2017] UKSC 78. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:58 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Felony murder and robbery A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Antomar Jones (“Appellant”) of two counts of robbery with a dangerous weapon; one count of felony murder; one count of attempted second-degree murder; two counts of use of a handgun in the commission ... [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Although a federal district court in Florida compelled arbitration of Jones Act negligence and sexual assault claims, among other claims against an employer arising out of an alleged on-ship rape of an employee, citing the arbitration clause in her employment contract, it would not compel arbitration of claims against the cruise line that owned the ship (or the individual defendant) because they were not signatories to the agreement (Haasbroek v. [read post]