Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 2481 - 2500 of 9,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 8:33 am by nflatow
U.S., the Supreme Court only upheld Section 2(B) of the highly controversial Arizona immigration law, also known as SB 1070 (Arizona's Senate Bill 1070). [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 10:12 pm
There were parties across the practical blawgosphere last night, following the Supreme Court's shocking decision in Arizona v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 5:07 am by Kelly
Unlike the first (in which cert was denied), the Supreme Court agreed to put the second set on its docket. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:12 am by Steve Kalar
   Judge Schroeder trumpets (well, notes) the Supreme Court’s reversal of AMdO in Descamps v. [read post]
Mexico further asserted that SB 4 undermines the federal government’s exclusive purview over immigration matters, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
And click here for the Supreme Court page displaying the Local Rules of Practice for all the Superior Courts. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:44 am
Inquiries into efforts to subvert the 2020 presidential election have given rise to all sorts of litigation, but relatively little of it has reached the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:29 am by Bill Raftery
When Colorado’s legislature made an attempt to create such a court in 1886, the state’s supreme court issued an advisory opinion that the proposed Court of Appeal was an unconstitutional infringement on the Supreme Court’s role as the supreme court of the state (the Supreme Court upheld a different version of the Court of Appeals in 1891). [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:25 am
" And Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor reports that "Supreme Court upholds Arizona law designed to thwart illegal workers; Federal immigration law does not preempt the 2007 Legal Arizona Workers Act, the Supreme Court said Thursday; The ruling gives new momentum to state efforts to crack down on illegal immigration. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 6:03 pm
Earlier this week, as detailed here, the Arizona Supreme Court decided that Crawford and the Confrontation Clause are inapplicable at the penalty phase of a capital case. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:24 am by brian
The Supreme Court, delaying scheduled executions in Arizona and Texas on Monday night and Tuesday, has put itself in a position to take on an issue that has lingered unresolved for two decades: whether there is a constitutional right to a lawyer performing effectively in a new challenge started after a conviction has become final. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
The complaint states, "[t]he parties purposefully availed themselves of the benefits of Arizona law," but does not explain how the state courts in Arizona have jurisdiction to hear the matter.... [42.] [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 10:13 am by Tara
” Thomas’ biography of O’Connor fleshes this description out, chronicling O’Connor’s childhood on an Arizona ranch, her time as a student at Stanford University and Stanford Law School (which included a marriage proposal from fellow student and future Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist), the years she worked as a legislator then as a judge in Arizona, and her groundbreaking role on the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
News from the Arizona Supreme Court: The Administrative Office of the Courts is pleased to announce the approval of Arizona’s application for funding through the John R. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 12:16 am by Jon Gelman
Industrial Commission of Arizona, No. 1 CA-IC 12-0038 held that the North American Free Trade Agreement did not pre-empt Arizona's workers' compensation statutes and that Porteadores del Noroeste could face liability in Arizona for the additional compensation that one of its workers, Adan Valenzuela, claimed he was due.Valenzuela worked for Porteadores as a driver,... [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:03 am
The Supreme Court today shot down an absolutely ridiculous Arizona law that made voters provide proof they were U.S. citizens when they vote. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:33 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
Whiting Against this background, the Supreme Court in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]