Search for: "BAKER V. STATE" Results 2481 - 2500 of 3,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Chief Judge Baker, Judges May and Crone. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this connection, think back to 2018’s Colorado same-sex-wedding baker case; there the Court ruled in favor of the baker not because he necessarily had an entitlement to be free from Colorado’s antidiscrimination law, but because the Colorado authorities harbored a religious bias against him as they enforced state law. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
Stewart Baker posted the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast: Thigh-High Boots and Defe [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:47 am by Elina Saxena
" David Ryan shed light on the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in the United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am by Nicholas Mosvick
McKenna joined the Lochner majority, written by Justice Peckham, in 1905 striking down a New York state law limiting bakers to 10-hour work days as an unconstitutional infringement upon the “liberty of contract. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:09 am by emagraken
The remaining decisions touch upon, if not directly address, the document disclosure obligations under both Rule 7-1(1)(a) and Rule 7-1(14) of the SCCR. [40] In addition, Master Baker has recently discussed the application of Rule 7-1 in Burgess v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 16 June 2023, Andrew Baker J quashed a prisoner governor’s decision to stop a man jailed for murder from talking to a journalist for a podcast about his appeal against conviction, R (Alexander) v Secretary of State for Justice [2023] EWHC 1407 (Admin). [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:01 pm by Rich Cassidy
I am thinking, of course, of the Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am by Tobias Thienel
Greece and Germany), i.e. by customary international law which the state has no choice but to follow (this goes to the justification of the infringement).However, the doctrines applied in the American cases cited do not follow from public international law (see Baker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Last week, I focused on how the United States' unreasonably high corporate taxes can hinder American companies' global competitiveness, and Hostess Brands' monthly operating report (required for bankruptcy proceedings) shows at page 15 that the beleaguered company was/is responsible for not only state, local and federal corporate income taxes, but also millions of dollars in other taxes, including (i) Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA); (ii) Federal Unemployment Tax… [read post]