Search for: "BES v. State" Results 2481 - 2500 of 68,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am by Jason Rantanen
  We have been told by many that the $2.2 billion Intel v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am by centerforartlaw
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
 the UK, in which the ECtHR was asked if persons outside an ECHR Contracting State fall within the Convention’s territorial jurisdiction if their electronic communications were (or were at risk of being) intercepted, searched and examined by that State’s intelligence agencies operating within its borders for the purposes of a complaint under Article 8 ECHR? [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am by CMS
In this post, Shabbir Bokhari, a paralegal in the Litigation & Arbitration team at CMS comments on the decision from the Supreme Court in R (AAA and Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42 which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
”We believe the Attorney General should lead by example, and afford justice to abuse victims, rather than hide behind technical objections which work to wrongfully prolong a victim’s trauma and which needlessly delay a claim’s disposition.Sadly, hypocrisy tends to be the scarlet letter when it comes to politics.# # #DECISIONFenton v State of New YorkATTORNEY GENERAL'S STATEMENT (upon CVA's enactment) [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 7:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
To be sure, in a series of cases staring with the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
This Fifth Circuit ruling is remarkable, not so much for its holding that a Texas man had a qualified right to confront witnesses against him in a hearing to revoke his supervised release, but for Judge Ho's concurring opinion, which is basically an amicus brief addressed to the Supreme Court's pending ruling in the Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]