Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 2481 - 2500 of 14,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2017, 11:43 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  I noted then that it seemed that after the Appellate Division’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 7:02 am by Howard Bashman
And Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined. [read post]
14 May 2014, 3:16 am by Amy Howe
” With the sixtieth anniversary of the Court’s ruling in Brown v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
In a new Cato podcast, I talk with Caleb Brown about the Court’s pending case on “disparate impact” liability in housing and finance, Texas Dept. of Housing vs. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:06 am by Howard Bashman
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivered the opinion of the Court in Health and Hospital Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB) the High Court considered the appropriate level of damages to award against a fan of the club for libellous statements made on an online forum. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:51 pm
Recommended: Ms Brown be transferred to a suitable location within 3 months Ms Brown be paid &po [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:51 am by Bob Hoffer
In the recent case of Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
§ 30.1     Generally The Case: Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:45 am by firstamendmentblogger
In today’s Washington Post, Robert Barnes looks at how the Court’s ruling in the violent video games case presents Justice Scalia’s and Justice Thomas’s sharply divergent views on what speech rights minors can claim under the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by firstamendmentblogger
Scotusblog gathers coverage of video game trade associations’ motion seeking over $1.1 million in legal fees and expenses stemming from their challenge to the now invalidated California law regulating the sale of violent games to minors. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by constitutional lawblogger
The Ninth Circuit en banc has refused to hear the the Ninth Circuit's 2-1 panel opinion affirming the district judge's conclusion that the controversial Proposition 8 is unconstitutional. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 8:27 am by Daily Record Staff
Civil litigation — No substantial justifications — Sanctions This appeal requires us to explore when pursuing a legal theory without substantial justification may result in an award of sanctions pursuant to Rule 1-341 against (1) an attorney and (2) a party. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:07 am by Juli Porto
In this week’s published civil opinion, the Court of Appeals decides whether a fiduciary can exercise a general power of appointment. [read post]