Search for: "Body v. Body"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 21,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
[The 14th entry in our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a guest post from Bill MacLeod, a former Federal Trade Commission bureau director and currently a partner with Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, where he chairs the firm’s antitrust practice and co-chairs its consumer protection practice. [read post]
9 May 2022, 6:32 am
By Gretchen Sisson When a draft of the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 6:00 am
He once opposed Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:05 am
The Appellate Division, noting that a writ of mandamus "is available to compel a governmental entity or officer to perform a ministerial duty, explained that the writ "does not lie to compel an act which involves an exercise of judgment or discretion" and citing Matter of Brusco v Braun, 84 NY2d 674, explained that such a writ is "an extraordinary remedy that is available only in limited circumstances. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:05 am
The Appellate Division, noting that a writ of mandamus "is available to compel a governmental entity or officer to perform a ministerial duty, explained that the writ "does not lie to compel an act which involves an exercise of judgment or discretion" and citing Matter of Brusco v Braun, 84 NY2d 674, explained that such a writ is "an extraordinary remedy that is available only in limited circumstances. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:05 am
The Appellate Division, noting that a writ of mandamus "is available to compel a governmental entity or officer to perform a ministerial duty, explained that the writ "does not lie to compel an act which involves an exercise of judgment or discretion" and citing Matter of Brusco v Braun, 84 NY2d 674, explained that such a writ is "an extraordinary remedy that is available only in limited circumstances. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:05 am
The Appellate Division, noting that a writ of mandamus "is available to compel a governmental entity or officer to perform a ministerial duty, explained that the writ "does not lie to compel an act which involves an exercise of judgment or discretion" and citing Matter of Brusco v Braun, 84 NY2d 674, explained that such a writ is "an extraordinary remedy that is available only in limited circumstances. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:01 am
Fla.) in Grayson v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am
” The guidance requires “service providers, intermediary, data centre, body corporate and Government organizations” to report cyber incidents to India’s Computer Emergency Response Team within six hours of noticing such incidents or being notified about such incidents. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm
Shortly after the Russian military invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, the European Union announced a series of sanctions to hit the Putin regime. [read post]
8 May 2022, 5:00 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:00 pm
From Church of the Holy Spirit of Wayland v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 9:15 am
In Cochlear Bone Anchored v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 3:51 am
In Cox v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:21 pm
Frisby v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:36 am
That corresponds to the sentiment expressed in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In American Needle, the Court stripped the National Football League of Section 1 immunity by holding that the NFL is not entitled to the single entity defense under Copperweld and instead, its conduct must be analyzed under the “flexible” rule of reason.[25] And last year, in NCAA v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:57 am
Buchanan Roe v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
What will America become if, as reported, the five most conservative members of the US Supreme Court angrily and emphatically overrule Roe v. [read post]