Search for: "Branch v. United States"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 4,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 9:29 am
In Wayman v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:43 pm
Morrison v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 11:31 am
United States, 51 U.S. 109, 135 (1850) (describing an emolument as "every species of compensation or pecuniary profit derived from a discharge of the duties of the office"); see also James C. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:28 am
V. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:23 am
Rev. 591 (2011) “Morrison v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:18 pm
United States invalidated Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell (DADT). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Francis v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
In the case of Harris v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
” Such an alteration in the respective powers of the judicial and legislative branches, says the court, would profoundly change the “scheme” of government so as to be a revision.Perhaps the seminal California Supreme Court case on the revision/amendment line is Raven v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
United States, litigants have also asked the Court to find presidential removal powers and immunities that lack an explicit basis in the Constitution’s text. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The co-chairs of the committee that worked on the report are former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates and former United States Representative Trey Gowdy. [read post]
A Presidential Proclamation to End the Iraq War: Unilateral Executive Action to Defang a Zombie AUMF
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
The Resolution provides that the: President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to— (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 10:03 pm
United States, 411 U.S. 526, 541, 93 S.Ct. 1702, 1711, 36 L.Ed.2d 472 (1973); Fortson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:06 pm
& Opportunities v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
See, Spertell v. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
As the Court later found in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:12 pm
The Act was codified over two different statutory titles and almost all the cites I have seen to it reference only the public law citation and not the United States Code. [read post]
