Search for: "Brothers v. State" Results 2481 - 2500 of 3,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
  As LaCroix later explains, this consensus “held that slavery was a local matter, that the states alone could regulate it, and that therefore the U.S. government lacked authority over slavery in the states” (216). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57;  Tot v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
The US Court of Appeals in Boston (First Circuit) ruled in Lluberes v Uncommon Productions (No. 10-2082)that the Lluberes brothers are ‘limited purpose’ public figures, in that they are well-known for a particular issue, although they are not household names. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
(Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Breaking news: Lara Jade Coton awarded $130,000 in damages (Plagiarism Today) Ohio record pirating statute pre-empted by Copyright Act: State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 2:30 pm
" (Steve Korris, "Davis lectures Starcher in insurance opinion", Aug. 16; Strahin v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:20 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Davidson Land Company, LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 10:46 am
I remember a chapter called "Lenin and Stolypin," drawing a contrast between Stolypin's vision of a nation of smallholders and Lenin's, well, Leninism (aside: it could be fun to run this comparison alongside other "competing visions,"--the brothers Gracchi, say, or Jefferson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:26 am
We know that Peters and DeLaughter have been accused of running a similar scam in the Eaton v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:03 pm by Steve Gottlieb
That story was repeated after World War II, after Brown v. [read post]