Search for: "Bui v. State"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 9,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2013, 11:52 am
In light of the decision in Loving et al v Commissioner where the court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to regulate tax preparers, the IRS has issued the following statement: As of Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has enjoined the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the regulatory requirements for registered tax return preparers. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
Here is the complaint in Harrison v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:18 pm
Jhaveri v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:48 pm
In a recent debt settlement case of the Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:47 am
Judge Reinhardt’s amicus brief in favor of striking down Prop 8 — aimed squarely at Justice Kennedy, naturally, and based largely on his opinion in Romer v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:46 am
State, supra. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:19 am
That is what happened in the 1989, case, "Paramount National Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:00 am
The defendants eventually moved for summary judgment, arguing that the suit was barred by the statute of frauds and that the complaint fails to state a viable claim. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:57 am
Morningware, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm
State. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 10:59 am
By Eric Goldman Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corp. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:38 am
In Carvel International v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 1:41 am
s onwards, people started to buy leases of between 40 and 99 years of properties. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:05 pm
[Trevor Burrus and Meggan DeWitt on Cato objection, jointly with Reason Foundation, in Holland v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:07 am
A federal jury found that the mistakes of James Moser in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 3:09 pm
") And in Barfield v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:21 pm
Burwell ruling that ACA does not authorize subsidy payments for consumers from states without their own exchanges that buy coverage through the federal exchange previously issued by a panel of the D.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
