Search for: "David S. Kennedy"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 2,681
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2007, 7:47 am
And, given swing Justice Anthony Kennedy's uncertain temper in war on terror cases, a five-justice majority may well find a pretext to do just that. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 6:16 am
(Hence the Court's right has been eliminated, and replaced by a new left.) [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 6:16 am
(Hence the Court's right has been eliminated, and replaced by a new left.) [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 12:58 am
Meanwhile, Milberg Weiss is reportedly in plea discussions with federal prosecutors, as is individually charged partner David J. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 3:03 pm
It seems obvious that this is not a legitimate concern given the House's power to appoint its own counsel in such matters. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:13 am
Kennedy wrote for the majority, which included Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 6:12 am
" And in The San Francisco Chronicle, Bob Egelko reports that "Rulings seal high court's shift to right. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 5:22 am
Kennedy provided the swing vote, joined by the court's liberal wing: Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 2:29 am
Kennedy voted. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
Kennedy provided the swing vote, joined by the court's liberal wing: Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 7:12 am
Kennedy advocated in his opinion, said Maree Sneed, IPS' Washington-based lawyer. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:01 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy provided the swing vote, joined by John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:46 pm
David L. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
As Justice David Souter rightly observed in dissent, Chief Justice Roberts's opinion offered no principled basis for disregarding the earlier decision. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
As Justice David Souter rightly observed in dissent, Chief Justice Roberts's opinion offered no principled basis for disregarding the earlier decision. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:21 pm
What is unclear is where Kennedy stands on how one defines a "compelling" interest. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Andrew Cohen has this post discussing Kennedy's concurrence at the WashingtonPost.com's Bench Conference blog. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 12:54 am
The Court's four liberals, Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and John Paul Stevens, dissented each time. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 11:03 am
RSS feeds: Dennis Kennedy was quite positive on the possibility of RSS being used to better control what information is received. [read post]
