Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 2481 - 2500 of 12,262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am by Peter Mahler
Mace v Tunick The analysis got more complicated in the wake of the Appellate Division, Second Department’s 2017 decision in the Mace v Tunick case that I wrote about here and here. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
I consider, therefore, that the only part of the defendant’s submission which warrants serious consideration is the contention that a defendant is entitled to the defence of qualified privilege if he honestly and reasonably believed that the person to whom he published the words complained of had a duty or interest as to the matters referred to in the communication. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm by Tobias Lutzi
Through her work as a scholar and a justice, just as much as through her personal struggles and achievements, Ruth Bader Ginsburg has inspired generations of lawyers. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Maybe the Sixth Circuit will reverse me again, but I can't impose a sentence on [the defendant] that . . . does not make sense to me. [read post]