Search for: "Fee v. Fee"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2010, 2:49 am
Bilkus v Stockler Brunton (a Firm) Court of Appeal “A solicitor rendering his fee note had to consider carefully, if charging uplift, whether the relevant work was contentious or non-contentious. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
Landis v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:42 pm
On November 17, 2010, the California Supreme Court granted review of the Third District’s decision in Kirby v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:55 pm
[Spain][Attorneys Fees][Granted in part] In Garcia v Ramsis, 2022 WL 18028257 (E.D. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:34 am
., Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
” It is from this ruling that Swinerton appealed.In Swinerton Builders v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:01 am
The absence of a signed written retainer agreement does not preclude the recovery of legal fees. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:17 pm
In fact, we are aware of only a single case – Winston Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 9:57 pm
Beery v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:00 am
In Fleur du Lac Estates Association v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 9:19 pm
The Court cited Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:56 am
Greer v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 11:32 pm
In Capitol v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:07 am
BIACC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Although in matrimonial matters, the award of counsel fees is typically a discretionary decision, see R. 5:3-5(c), “[i]f the parties have stipulated by agreement that the husband will pay counsel fees to the wife in an amount to be fixed by the court, the court cannot refuse to allow any counsel fees at all. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:15 pm
NNDJ, INC. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
By Amanda Maine, J.D.A divided panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the lower court and Bank of America in holding that certain banking fees charged but not disclosed amounted to an omission of material fact, and therefore the plaintiff’s state law claims of breach of contract and fiduciary duty were preempted by SLUSA and must be brought in federal court (Goldberg v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 9:01 am
In determining attorneys' fee awards under the Voting Rights Act, while "the court should generally use the prevailing hourly rate in the district where it sits to calculate what has been called the 'lodestone' -- what we think is more aptly termed the 'presumptively reasonable fee' -- the district court may adjust this base hourly rate to account for a plaintiff's reasonable decision to retain out-of-district counsel, just as it may adjust the… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 4:49 pm
In Quiroga v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:49 am
Union can require non-members to contribute to union’s legal feesLocke et al. v. [read post]
