Search for: "Files v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 3,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
(PatLit) EWHC (Ch) Looney v Trafigura – a fable of copyright communication (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General US IP Enforcement Coordinator issues annual report (IP Watch) US Chamber of Commerce releases 2011 IP policy agenda (IP Watch) New White House IP Advisory Committees elevate IP enforcement to highest level (IP Watch) (Patent Baristas) (Copyright Alliance) (The Domains) Jimmie Reyna to finally get confirmation hearing (Inventive Step) US to refresh… [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm
Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, only thirty-nine percent of those surveyed could explain that the Senate is assigned the role of advising and consenting to new Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The PCT application names the three inventors as inventors and as applicants for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm
., v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
Yale Law professor Charles Reich is better remembered (usually skeptically) for his treatise on The Greening of America, describing his view of three stages of consciousness, roughly described as: 1) individual and self-reliance; 2) technology and bureaucracy and 3) a shared quest for understanding and a nonviolent sense of cooperation.[16] That Reich is better remembered, skeptically, for this work than his influential legal scholarship is a testament to the extent to which… [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
New York politicians are expected to vote to force the city’s police force to divulge the surveillance technology it uses, one of many reforms of law enforcement being considered across the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
AIU North America, No. 0430, Control No. 13110820 (C.P. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
The district court and First Circuit disagreed, citing United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
July 2, 2009). http://kuex.us/71aa Doc Retention and Destruction: United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
NELP represented 28 fair-share fee payers—current and former home care workers in the state—in an amicus brief filed in the case. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 opinion by Judge Neil Gorsuch in Epic Systems v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Assistant Attorney General Tony West, and filed with the court on August 29. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
” Based on the historical pedigree of qui tam statutes in England and the United States, the Supreme Court upheld qui tam informers’ standing in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Or, how I turned a $70 filing fee into $23M in cash – Chint, Schneider Electric patent dispute (Patent Baristas) Europe EU report ‘United States Barriers to Trade and Investment Report 2008’ (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Intellectual Property Watch) (The IP Factor) Swedish EU presidency mooting European standard for patent searches (BLOG@IP::JUR) Wine growers, take note: new Regulation for designations (Class 46) OHIM lays down… [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 11:52 pm
Introduction An estimated 11.6 million unauthorized aliens [1] are currently in the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm
On January 4, 2020, Judge Vanessa Baraitser of Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the extradition request of the United States for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, 49, because of Assange’s mental condition. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm
On January 4, 2020, Judge Vanessa Baraitser of Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the extradition request of the United States for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, 49, because of Assange’s mental condition. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
That omission doesn't bother us.The court cited with approval an earlier state court case in which the defendant sold a skeleton truck to a company that then installed a refrigeration unit on the chasis. [read post]
