Search for: "French v. French" Results 2481 - 2500 of 4,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2016, 7:59 pm
 Actavis therefore requested DNIs in respect of the UK, French, Italian and Spanish designations of the patent. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:00 am
  Navigating the Enforcement DirectiveA week before Christmas, the Court of Justice of the EU handed down its judgment in IT Development SAS v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
 It also comes in French and Spanish [Merpel thinks that this is because the English, the French and the Spanish are the three languages whose speakers are most reluctant to master any other languages, but that's another matter]. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
I Marks misleading the public on the paternity of copyright works are fraudulent - say French Supreme Court I Should the court be indifferent to consumer indifference regarding the mark? [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:49 pm
In response to the French and Belgian bans, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that a ban on wearing Islamic full-face veils is justified on the grounds of living together, rulings that many academic circles have criticized. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:20 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 Section V – Copyright enforcement: the technological and cross-border dimensions Section five covers copyright enforcement, in four detailed chapters. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:42 pm by Madhulika Vishwanathan
 Moving on further, Aparajita highlighted the Bombay High court’s recent decision on Trademark infringement of SABMiller India Ltd. v/s Som. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 3:38 am by Ben
Theatre publisher Samuel French, now owned by Concord, represents the rights in the original musical. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The case of Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54, decided in June, aimed to answer this question in the fair land of Australia. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:37 am by Miquel Peguera
In any event, the discussion may be moot in a few months, when the CJEU hands down its judgment on the CNIL v Google case. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
” Commenting on the absence of any stock certificate supporting Zwarycz’s claim, the court wrote: The mere fact that a corporation did not issue any stock certificates does not preclude a finding that a particular individual has the rights of a shareholder (see Kun v Fulop, 71 AD3d at 833; French v French, 288 AD2d 256, 256; Blank v Blank, 256 AD2d 688). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:26 am by Ronald Collins
Those are Justice Antonin Scalia’s words, taken from Monday’s eye-opening dissent in Maryland v. [read post]