Search for: "Gay v. State"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 3,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2009, 4:35 pm
Texas State Board of Pharmacy Vigorously Pursues New Sanction Guidelines for Criminal Offenses - Austin lawyer Louis Leichter of Leichter Law Firm on their Texas Medical Licensing Law Blog Facebook Announces New Privacy Controls - Columbus attorney Brian Hall of Porter Wright on the firm's Employer Law Report Court Makes Three Adults Pay Child Support for One Child - Emory law student Gideon Alper on his Gay Couples Law Blog The Return Of The Rule 2019 Question: Delaware… [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:05 pm
Now, in an order handed down yesterday in response to an emergency motion for reconsideration, in Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:42 pm
- Boise attorney Chuck Peterson on Peterson Law Offices' Idaho Criminal Defense Blog David v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 12:00 am
From SSRN:Elliott Visconsi, The Invention of Criminal Blasphemy: Rex v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:00 am
The European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in Scoppola v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The sodomy law appears to be aimed particularly at Gay and Lesbian citizens since it does not ban male/female vaginal sex. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Supreme Court found a state statute criminalizing sodomy between same-sex couples to be unconstitutional in Lawrence v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:09 am
With only three states currently allowing same-sex marriage, and two to introduce the union in the fall, it would be difficult for gay rights activists to defend a consensus in their favor at present. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 10:15 am
v=0WyYRA4aZSI This is the first such amendment in the Country that has failed with the voters. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:33 am
" This refers, of course, to the Court of Appeal judgment in Quila & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1482. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 6:12 pm
Thus, while Loeffelholz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 2:00 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
Article II, § 2 identifies the President as the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’ and the Supreme Court has stated unequivocally that the President has the prerogative to establish rules and regulations for the armed forces. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:53 am
Whatever one thinks of Mitchell's reasoning, it's curious to learn that ADF again purports to find authority in Dean v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
It permitted his state-law claims to go forward to trial, however. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Indeed, in both states a succession of Republican governors in recent years had meant that the high courts of the state were not totally dominated by Democratic appointees. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
In one early case, decided in 1990, High Tech Gays v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
In one early case, decided in 1990, High Tech Gays v. [read post]
