Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 44,733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2011, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
State v. [read post]
Employee has the burden of showing the abolishment of his or her position was not made in good faith
15 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
Employee has the burden of showing the abolishment of his or her position was not made in good faithBelvey v Tioga County, 257 AD2d 967 In January 1998 the Tioga County legislature abolished its position of Director of Data Processing and, implementing recommendations by both a private consultant and the Governor’s Task Force on Information Resource Management regarding future data processing needs for the county, created a new position -- Director, Division of Information… [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 9:11 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
The court applies Pennsylvania state law. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
Perhaps there is a good reason to allow a disgraced Illinois pol lock in his choice as Senator under these circumstances. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:48 am
In both decisions the courts discussed United States Dep’t of Treasury v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 8:44 am
This is a very good opinion, with the 9th, courtesy of a visiting judge, providing a Bright-line.US v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm
Shortly after Riegel v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:34 am
Sand & Gravel Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2006, 5:53 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:58 am
Does v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 3:43 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348 (Iskanian) precluded enforcement of PAGA waivers, but asserted that Iskanian was wrongly decided and in any event was no longer good law in light of the 2018 opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm
First is Tyler v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
In the case Batson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:27 am
US v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:53 am
Again relying on the state constitution, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously ruled (in York v. [read post]
