Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 2481 - 2500
of 18,400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court previously upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in its admissions process in 2016 by a vote of four to three following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia and the recusal of Justice Elena Kagan. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 11:17 am
I clerked for Justice Breyer 20 years ago, in the term following Bush v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 3:49 am
I remember when candidate Trump, from the debate stage, announced he would appoint a Supreme Court justice who would overrule Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
In Bellotti v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm
Matters came to a head when Mr Miller re-tweeted an upsetting limerick denigrating trans women. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Fourteen years later, Breyer joined Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion for the majority in American Legion v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:20 am
See State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm
Kastenberg, The Limits of Executive Power in Crisis in the Early Republic: Martin v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
I am delighted to announce that the essays in Volume 16(1) of Emancipating the Mind: Bulletin of the Coalition for Peace & Ethics (Summer 2021) (ISSN 2689-0283 (Print); 2689-0291 (Online); ISBN 978-1-949943-06-1) are now available.This issue includes essays on Contemporary China--Heartland, Periphery, and Silk Roads. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
And the administration has not yet rescinded the Department of Justice’s October 2017 religious freedom guidance, which fosters discrimination in the name of religion. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 10:00 am
As Justice Snauffer says:"The facts are simple. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:59 am
The days of Griggs v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
The case of Banks v Cadwalladr concluded before Steyn J in the Royal Courts of Justice this week, with Cadwalladr arguing that her belief that the “covert relationship” between Banks and the Russian government was reasonable; the defence of public interest applies. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm
From Bixler v. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
In case you’re curious, footnote 1 tells us that Justice Robinson was present for oral argument but did not participate in the decision. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:30 pm
In 1957, in Lambert v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
From In re David S. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The Justice Dept. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:35 pm
Last month, the Minnesota Court of Appeals decided State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm
From In re Inquiry Concerning Hon. [read post]
