Search for: "John Doe 2 " Results 2481 - 2500 of 12,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2019, 2:24 am
Accordingly, the Board found the thirteenth du Pont factor to be neutral.Conclusion: Finding that the weakness of the registered mark did not outweigh the other relevant du Pont factors, the Board affirmed this Section 2(d) refusal to register.Read comments and post your comment here.KKM comment: Looks like the Board wasn’t willing to throw Applicant a bone in this case.Text Copyright Kira-Khanh McCarthy and John L. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:25 am
Harder to guess than in a Section 2(d) case, without knowing the evidence.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
[Starbucks' Section 2(f) claim based on five years of continuous and substantially exclusive use was not challenged].Green Circle Alone: Starbucks also sought registration of this mark under Section 2(f) (thereby conceding that the mark is not inherently distinctive), but this time the USPTO challenged that claim. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:44 am
Ford of Martinsville, West Virginia filed more than 22,000 "John Doe" lawsuits in 2010 against people across the country, accusing them of downloading super-raunchy films like Teen Anal Nightmare 2 and Juicy White Anal Booty 4 from the Internet. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:44 am
Ford of Martinsville, West Virginia filed more than 22,000 "John Doe" lawsuits in 2010 against people across the country, accusing them of downloading super-raunchy films like Teen Anal Nightmare 2 and Juicy White Anal Booty 4 from the Internet. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:50 pm
Part 2 in this series, an op-ed by Professor Charles Fried, is here. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:16 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
  The jury allocated 97% of fault to McDonald’s, and much like the Six Flags case in Georgia, apportioned only 2% of fault to one known attacker and the remaining 1% to John Doe attackers who were never identified. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
"The Federal Circuit has long held that a determination in district court litigation does not bind the USPTO in a later ex parte proceeding. [read post]