Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 28,044
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm
Apparently the panel conducted a rehearing and the new opinion modifies the old one in a few ways, primarily to bring the opinion in line with the Second Circuit’s opinion in Viacom v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 8:39 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently issued a decision in Illinois Commerce Commission, et al., v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:58 am
Background Under ARPA, state governments are in line to receive $195.3 billion in Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Funds, which can be used for four enumerated purposes, and which specifically cannot be used to cut state taxes. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:51 pm
“‘[I]t is an inescapable fact of modern commercial life that a substantial amount of business is transacted solely by mail and wire communications across state lines, thus obviating the need for physical presence within a State in which business is conducted. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release which meant that the claimant, Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]
23 May 2009, 6:02 am
We join this line of cases in terms of outcome, doing so by following the line of cases which hold that Hodari, and in this state our decision in [State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:23 am
In Friends of Eel River (my July 31, 2017 post on which can be found here), the Supreme Court held that another federal law – the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 (“ICCTA”) – does not preempt CEQA’s application to a railroad project undertaken by a state public entity on a rail line also owned by that state entity; it reasoned that even though a state’s imposition of environmental regulations like… [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:06 am
But now the issue is in state court and state laws will be at issue. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
The court applies Pennsylvania state law. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:08 am
I'm not sure this would be exactly right in a case where the court actually enforces an arbitral order; I think there would be state action restricting speech, but likely constitutionally permissible state action because the parties had contractually waived their speech rights, see Cohen v. [read post]
10 May 2006, 9:43 pm
The case of Rowley v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:39 am
JURY INSTRUCTIONUnited States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 10:31 am
09/10/09 ADF news release:In Burns v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:45 am
Pursuant to the 1997, 5th Circuit opinion, Higginbotham v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
Then, quoting Standard Oil v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:50 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:43 am
Last Friday, in LG Display v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Access Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 6:25 am
"From "High-stakes case about pigs/National Pork Producers v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
