Search for: "Little v State" Results 2481 - 2500 of 26,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2013, 6:55 am by Michelle O'Neil
  The truth is that even if the litigants in US v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
Published reports citing court filings stated that company executives met with the mediator in a full-day session, followed by a number of phone calls, without success. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 11:02 am by Adam Levitin
The headlines look pretty bad:  the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held the CFPB's structure to be unconstitutional in a case call PHH v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:34 pm
Without the question mark, that's Alaska's state motto.With the question mark, it's our title for a post analyzing the on-going trial in State of Alaska v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Although decided over two decades apart, United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 5:37 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include: LectureAlexis Mourre, For a Universal Standard for Conflicts Disclosures Case Comments John R Crook, Kimberly-Clark Dutch Holdings, BV, Kimberly-Clark SLU, and Kimberly-Clark BVBA v Venezuela Andrés Mazuera, Glencore v Colombia: A Tale of Legally Coerced Evidence Patrick Leonard, Patrick Costello v the Government of Ireland, Ireland and the Attorney General: Obstacles to the Ratification of CETA in the Irish Constitutional Context Laura… [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
 I mean, sure, it may be a crime, but do we really care all that much if a guy takes a little water that's flowing off of a big hill near some railroad tracks? [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:52 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Here in the States, we have a three day weekend, and I will be busily working on home projects and thinking about braving the crowds at the little beach by my house. [read post]
6 May 2013, 12:09 pm
  Particularly when, as with medical marijuana, lots of municipalities pass similar laws, and especially when (as here) there's little to no recourse to an out-of-state forum.There's admittedly a structural problem underneath all of this, and one that the California Supreme Court either overlooks or deliberately fails to mention. [read post]