Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 3,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 12:57 am
I am pleased to reproduce below the latest guest post submission. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 11:00 am
(c) A warning from the EPO was legitimately expected by the appellant. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:04 am
(c).) [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am
Owen J found that it did (see para. 30 of his judgment), but it may be doubted whether a scheme of this kind for compensating victims of anti-social conduct from public funds was intended to fall within the ambit of the Regulation. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
c. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm
The present matter concerns the claim construction. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:23 am
The following guest post was written by Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch Partner Mark J. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:55 am
Full post is coming later, but the key points are: (a) a claim by a public authority for possession requires a domestic court to be able to consider the proportionality of the eviction and resolve factual disputes for itself and the court may refuse to make an order or postpone/suspend it for a period of time (at [21], [45], [49]) (b) the court must consider the Art 8 defence if raised and it is not just in “highly exceptional” cases that such a defence might be raised; the real… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
§ 355(j)(2)(A)(iii), (j)(2)(C). [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 5:25 am
(b) In any event, a petition under Article 227 cannot be called a writ petition. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:16 am
Why should that matter -- it's Miami! [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
When the demand did not prompt a response, defendant on April 22, 2008 moved to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
The ex parte collaboration between Judge Stuard and the prosecution to prepare the court’s sentencing opinion was “wholly inconsistent” with the ethical constraints of Canon 3(B)(7) and DR 7-110(B). [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 9:51 pm
” b) Dr. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:57 pm
b. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:50 pm
Required Disclosures What: (Proposed Item 24 to Schedule 14A; Item 402(b) of Reg. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:09 am
C. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:37 am
., No. 10 C 1203, Slip Op. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:32 pm
s. 197 “common bawdy-house” means a place that is (a) kept or occupied, or (b) resorted to by one or more persons for the purpose of prostitution or the practice of acts of indecency; Second, what are the relevant prostitution laws in for Canada? [read post]
