Search for: "MATTER OF MOORE"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 3,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 8:13 am
Moore (09-658): originally conference of February 19 Nurre v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 6:25 pm
The type of court that I preside over requires a broad understanding of all types of matters handled by civil courts. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:52 pm
Moore as judicial barriers. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am
Moore Docket: 09-658 Issues: (1) Whether the Fulminante standard — that the erroneous admission of a coerced confession at the trial is not harmless — applies when a collateral challenge is based on a defense attorney’s decision not to move to suppress a confession prior to a guilty or no contest plea, even though no record of a trial is available for review, and (2) even if it does, whether it is “clearly established Federal law” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
" Moore's Federal Practice, ¶ 65.21 (1989). [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:32 am
Commissioners OK legal help center for courthouse New appointment made to fill a void in County Courts By BRADEN LAMMERSBraden.Lammers@newsandtribune.com Judicial matters were the predominant theme at the Clark County Commissioners meeting Thursday. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:32 am
Commissioners OK legal help center for courthouse New appointment made to fill a void in County Courts By BRADEN LAMMERSBraden.Lammers@newsandtribune.com Judicial matters were the predominant theme at the Clark County Commissioners meeting Thursday. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:09 pm
The parties to the lawsuit could not agree whether this expense was reasonable and the matter was brought before the BC Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:22 am
As has been reported all over the legal media, Industrial gas producer Airgas filed suit against Cravath, Swaine & Moore on Friday over the firm's role as legal adviser to rival Air Products on that company's $5.1 billion bid for Airgas. ... [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
This edition of “Petitions to Watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ private conference on Friday, February 19. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
The difference between the Conservative C-61 and the Liberal C-60 is not a matter of legal fine tuning. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 10:59 am
Moore, the United States Supreme Court held that it was irrelevant under the Fourth Amendment that police made in arrest contrary to a state statute prohibiting arrest for certain minor violations. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:15 pm
Moore, the United States Supreme Court held that it was irrelevant under the Fourth Amendment that police made in arrest contrary to a state statute prohibiting arrest for certain minor violations. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:27 pm
Ditching the billable hour will give law firms the freedom to run themselves as they see fit, to invest in their people, and to staff matters in the most appropriate ways. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 2:31 pm
Industrial gas supplier Airgas has sued its former law firm, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, alleging conflict of interest and breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
When Airgas first retained Cravath to assist on a debt financing matter, Airgas bluntly told us that the relationship would not go beyond executing debt financing. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
The matter sub judice follows Moore v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 4:33 pm
The book has a 20-page two-column keyword index which we reproduce unformatted below for search purposes for those who might be interested in the immense scope of the subject matter covered by this book:380 – The Keyword Index to Stars Stones and Scholars- the numbers refer to the page numbers in the book where the keyword appearsAAaran – 52 Aberdeen - 42, 43, 63Aborigines – 10 Aboyne - 44Abruzzo – 275 Abydos - 34, 115, 308Achernar - 160, 299 Aegean Sea - 22Aeniad… [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
Moore v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:20 am
" It claims that the federal aiding and abetting statute, along with the substantive provisions of the Hate Crimes Act, will subject plaintiffs to federal questioning, investigation and prosecution for preaching God's word.The Thomas Moore Law Center, which represents plaintiffs, issued a long press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit. [read post]
