Search for: "Mark A. Smith"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 4,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Unite Here * Trademark Dilution Symposium Videos * Griper Selling Anti-Walmart Items Through CafePress Doesn’t Infringe or Dilute–Smith v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
However, for only “average” well-known marks”, the threshold of necessary closeness depends on how well-known the trademark is, on the similarity of the marks, and on the type of injury. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
However, for only “average” well-known marks”, the threshold of necessary closeness depends on how well-known the trademark is, on the similarity of the marks, and on the type of injury. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE… [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:19 am
The Kat was even more astonished to discover from the excellent Adam Smith (World Trademark Review) that he had written on this very subject as long ago as 9 November last year. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:39 pm
UNITED KINGDOM: AZRights IP Brands Blog and @Azrights: information and news about trade marks, copyright, internet marketing, social networking, search engine optimization, protection of reputations and brands on the internet by UK practitioner Shireen Smith. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:00 am
Mark S. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Sineneng-Smith, which the court decided in May. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:53 pm
With best regards, Mark D. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 9:22 am
No news on Mr Smith’s involvement. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 6:12 am
Smith and Mark L. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 4:04 pm
If not, you've still got more than a week to make your mark. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 2:29 am
Palestinian Auth., 566 U.S. 449, 454 (2012) (internal alteration and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:26 am
The argument is perhaps best summed up by Marcus Smith J, who described it as “hopeless” because “DABUS would – by reason of its status as a thing and not a person – be incapable of conveying any property to Dr Thaler. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 6:42 pm
" In re The Proctor & Gamble Co. at *2-4 (citations, internal quotation marks, and footnotes omitted). [read post]
