Search for: "Matter of Kennedy"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 4,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
J., and Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
Kennedy, supporting the Wire Act of 1961because it was carefully tailored so as not to criminalize common bettors. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:39 am
What matters is that the FDA enforces the FDCA and it could have but has not prohibited the label in question. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 11:12 am
No matter the public outcry, it was more important for the court to proceed with the participation of nine justices in every possible case. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
Briefly: At ACSblog, Rochelle Bobroff highlights the surprising “gang of four” — Justices Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, and Kennedy) that was part of the majority in two sovereign immunity decisions (VOPA v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:43 pm
Army Judge Advocate General"[The POTUS/CINC wants] to get at the fact (no matter how) for the sake of discipline [and to that end,]...THERE IS NO BETTER WITNESS AGAINST A MAN THAN HIMSELF! [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:19 am
On Tuesday is a matter from the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:10 pm
Why does this matter? [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:01 am
While the best law school choice is in the end a matter of personal fit, there are a few reasons I chose HLS that I like to pass on. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:52 pm
And speaking of DWI enforcement, Paul Kennedy has interesting posts up here and here about increasingly popular no-refusal policies, and reports a rumor that state Sen. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm
One month after the June 1963 Birmingham demonstrations, President Kennedy spoke on national television. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:54 am
Nor does it matter who is right. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:36 am
These matters, again, must be evaluated in light of the existence of a reasonable risk to the legitimate interests of the company ( Re Ontario Jockey Club and SEIU, Local 528 ,17 LAC (2d) 176 (Kennedy) at 178-9). [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:51 am
Writing for a seven-Justice majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy observed that what suffices for a waiver depends on the right at issue. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
Waxman to begin his substantive argument, four more Justices – Scalia, Kennedy, Breyer, and the Chief Justice – had joined the discussion as well. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 4:57 am
Anyway, now the justices are contemplating a motion for reconsideration in their Kennedy v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 12:00 am
In the former view, nothing mattered but the established lot lines. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
There was no need, in other words, for the Court or the Constitution to step into the matter. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:52 am
He portrayed constitutional law as a matter of technical conceptions that shouldn't be allowed to stop government from doing the things that need to be done. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Iqbal was a 5 to 4 decision delivered on May 18, 2009 by Justice Kennedy held that Iqbal’s complaint failed to plead sufficient facts to state a claim for purposeful and unlawful discrimination. [read post]
