Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 2481 - 2500 of 6,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2016, 9:18 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD 8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:53 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Today the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case of Black v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm by Xandra Kramer
Following decisions in such cases as Connelly v RTZ, Lubbe v Cape and Ngcobo v Thor Chemicals, the present case contributes to the development of the law relating to the jurisdiction of English co [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
C.A.), the Court stated (para. 3): “In our view, exceeding the Crown’s submission without an adequate evidential foundation constituted an error in principle. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:06 am by INFORRM
Yet, after stating the principle, the majority takes a somewhat bizarre turn in finding that “notwithstanding the fact that the applicant claims a violation of Article 8 … the Court has to determine whether the principles inherent to Article 10 were properly applied by the Austrian courts” (para. 42). [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 5:09 am by Elena Chachko
(at the time) recognized a terrorism exception to State immunity (para. 88). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
”  [14][1]          United States Telecom Association v. [read post]