Search for: "People v. West" Results 2481 - 2500 of 3,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Wyoming, discusses the agreement—and challenges still facing the millions of people, creatures, plants, and ecosystems that depend on the Colorado for water. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Sean Burke
In Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
Assisted dying: Rob Marris, Labour Member for Wolverhampton South West, came top of the Commons ballot for private Members’ bills and decided to introduce an Assisted Dying Bill, (14 June 2015). [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm by Victoria Kwan
Without independence, there is no West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
It states: “Article 7. (1) All powers in the Republic belong to the people, and their exercise on behalf of the people shall be effected only under, and by the authority of, this Constitution(2) This Constitution is, as the solemn expression of the will of the people, the supreme law of the Republic, and if any other law is inconsistent with this Constitution that other law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
Introduction   Chinese Marxist Leninist constitutional theory is modernity’s nightmare.[1]The development of a constitutional order from out of a revolutionary movement[2]has produced a constitutionalist framework that is quite consciously distinct from that common to the West and its baseline liberal democratic constitutional orders. [read post]