Search for: "Performance Contractors, Inc" Results 2481 - 2500 of 3,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm by Monica Williamson
Michigan Indian Legal Services, Inc (MILS) Staff Attorney, Traverse City, MI. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 10:15 am by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
Wells Bowen Realty, Inc., 736 F.3d 722 (6th 2013). [read post]
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:23 pm by Thomas Robinson, J.D.
University of Del., 269 A.2d 52 (Del. 1970), the Delaware Supreme Court held that contractors may be liable on a theory of implied indemnity if they breach "an obligation to perform [their] work with due care" [269 A.2d at 57]. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:15 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Evidence was presented that neither O'Malley nor his company was trained to perform the asbestos removal work and that O'Malley agreed to remove the asbestos insulation for an amount that was substantially less than a trained asbestos abatement contractor would have charged to perform the work. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:17 am by Jon L. Gelman
In spite of these instructions and the employee's restricted work status, management ordered him back to work and required him to perform these duties. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm by Alain Leibman
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, 580 F.2d 1122, 1131 n.18 (2nd Cir. 1978) (Rule covers contractor records provided to Atomic Energy Commission); United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada defined this concept in Naylor Group Inc. v. [read post]