Search for: "Pool v. State"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 2,949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2016, 7:07 am
However, it is notable that in Patterson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:31 pm
Id. at *31-32 (quoting Doe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:40 am
Phillip Turner, the plaintiff in Turner v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Property used predominantly outside the United States does not qualify for a Section 1603 grant. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:07 am
However, it is notable that in Patterson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am
In the near term, there is nothing that Apple has to fear from the enforcement of SEPs in EU Member States. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:24 am
See SEC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:37 pm
Burwell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:00 pm
McMahon (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Google sued again for trade mark infringement in relation to AdWords program: Soaring Helmet v Leatherup.com (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Psystar – Psystar owes Apple $75,000 while Apple moves to lift stay in dispute over unauthorised Mac clones (Ars Technica) [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:01 am
See SEC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Hedge fund undergoes change in ownership In the case of Bowen v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Hedge fund undergoes change in ownership In the case of Bowen v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:31 am
/L.S. and L.V. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:00 pm
” Manson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:51 am
VERRILLI: With Congress, it’s true there have been times in the [United States v.] [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm
To the extent the Judicial Conference guidance purports to address this problem it only states that the JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet should state "the remedy sought has implication beyond the parties before the court or that the case seeks to bar or mandate statewide or nationwide enforcement of a state of federal law. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:11 pm
These data can be parsed somewhat differently when senators are separated by state. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:40 pm
To aid in thinking about this question, consider Grutter v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:25 pm
Wednesday, that will come to be known by the first case of the two: FERC v. [read post]
