Search for: "Quick v. State" Results 2481 - 2500 of 4,944
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2015, 7:18 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Aspiring IP scholars sometimes ask me what conferences they should attend, so here is a quick overview of some of the many options. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The surveillance aspects to these orders follow the precedent set in Howlett v Holding [2006] EWHC 41 (QB) where Eady J stated: Holding has revealed that he has had Mrs Howlett watched at various times and wishes to retain his right to do so, whatever anxiety and distress that may cause her [16]. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
There was still no infringement or passing off so far as SCRABBLE v SCRAMBLE was concerned, however. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:48 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
This case also provides insight on settlements that seek quick relief. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 9:19 pm
At the time, Calcar was publishing "Quick Tips" guides: booklets with condensed information from a car's owner's manual. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 am by Nabiha Syed
United States and Tolentino v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:01 am by Leonard Jernigan
In Wisconsin, a case I handled established the compensability of secondary inhalation [Kufall v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:05 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
” Campos was referring to Scalia’s concurring, dissenting opinion issued in Arizona v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:03 am by Howard Bashman
Adler has a post titled “On the Eve of Argument in California v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:15 pm by Daniel Low
The court also found that the purported pro-competitive benefit suggested by defendants – driving down compensation to workers – was not a cognizable procompetitive benefit under the Sherman Act.California v. [read post]