Search for: "Root v. State" Results 2481 - 2500 of 4,649
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
  Here’s what Mihok held on that subject:The Complaint is rooted in FDA Warning Letters which state that [defendant] failed to comply with the CGMP regulations. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The challenge reached the state’s highest court, the New York Court of Appeals, which issued a strangely reasoned opinion, People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:55 am by Mark Graber
Constitutional theory as interpretation places Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
McNeely, supra [describing an involuntary blood draw as `a compelled physical intrusion’ of bodily integrity that invades `an individual's “most personal and deep-rooted expectation of privacy”’].)People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:55 am
”  Actually, the Ohio Supreme Court put it more eloquently, by stating: “As a matter of law, the guest is charged with sufficient knowledge of the hazards to be required to protect herself against falls. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 10:46 am
At oral argument in the Supreme Court’s most recent Origination Clause case some years ago, United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
These include digital forensic preservation and investigation, notification of a broad range of third parties and other constituencies,[1] fulfillment of state and federal compliance obligations, potential litigation, engagement with law enforcement, the provision of credit monitoring, crisis management, a communications plan – and the list goes on. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm by Jason M. Halper
The dispute over whether internal reporting is covered by Dodd-Frank’s anti-retaliation provisions is rooted in what  the Commission has argued is conflicting statutory language. [read post]