Search for: "STATE v CLARK" Results 2481 - 2500 of 3,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:42 am by Marty Schwimmer
They must now live with that choice and can benefit only under the protection of a patent, not that of a trademark Decision- 7 Cir – GP v Kimberly Clark// [read post]
The current law is now stated in the Equality Act 2010 but the issues in this appeal remain pertinent and are not affected by the revocation of the Regulations. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
This will be heard by Lords Phillips, Mance, Kerr, Clarke and Wilson on Wednesday 27 July 2011. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  Lords Phillips and Clarke felt they could, and that a broad and progressive interpretation should be applied to strip states of immunity for executory as well as adjudicatory proceedings. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:03 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) CPS v F [2011] EWCA Crim 1844 (21 July 2011) McDonald v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1776 (21 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rees & Anor v Peters [2011] EWCA Civ 836 (21 July 2011) Finnerty & Anor v Clark & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 858 (21 July 2011) Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Norton & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 834 (21 July 2011) Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Richards… [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 8:29 am by Albert Wan
United States, Case No. 10-CV-1885 (N.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am by Marie Louise
Becton, Dickinson and Company (Patently-O) Patent malpractice litigation: State versus federal jurisdiction: Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]