Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2013, 9:41 pm
Under Danny’s Law, which is the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008’s Section 104, play yards will have to include side rails that do not make a sharp V formation when folded. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:29 pm
The Florida Supreme Court recently decided Jackson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
Unrelated to this, the Virginia Senate refused to agree to legislation that would allow the hunting of fast-moving, sharp-toothed beasts on Sundays.13. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm
Others, by sharp contrast, view an offer to return “their data” to research participants as akin to a human right. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp., No. 11-4358, slip op. (2d Cir. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 am
Relying on Mandl v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
(c) In how many libel appeals did Eady J, Tugendhat J or Sharp J appear on the panel? [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am
R. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am
R. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm
Moreover, in sharp distinction with cellulosic biofuel, there appears to be no great obstacle to the production of advanced biofuel generally; to the extent that estimates in the record are relatively low, that seems to be based on want of a market, which of course continued pressure will tend to solve." [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:32 am
In Alvarez v. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Not an "Offense" to Violate Supervised Release in the Ninth - Jensen and Sec. 3146
21 Jan 2013, 5:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
[*Long post] I had earlier introduced Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 2013 (“Policy”). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 12:18 pm
Op. at 9 (quoting Craven v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm
The apparently sharp distinction between judicially created private law principles, and democratically enacted legislative rules and policies, is therefore questioned, and it is argued that to describe the principles of the law of tort without referring to statute is potentially highly misleading. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
Progress also serves as a sharp- edged ruler held by whomever is the current victor: it divides civilizations into civilized and un-civilized, the latter fit for conquering and exploiting as they are brought into progress, into the light. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am
Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
(c) In how many libel appeals did Eady J, Tugendhat J or Sharp J appear on the panel? [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:46 pm
” In 1994, in Dolan v. [read post]
