Search for: "State v Locke" Results 2481 - 2500 of 3,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2019, 7:20 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The union stated that the employer’s decision to employ surveillance was a product of “paranoia and distrust” arising out of bad labour relations, and that it was unnecessary in the circumstances to determine whether anyone, or who, was accessing the locked filing cabinet. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:24 am by Guest Blogger
As soon as society opts to incarcerate, however, it faces a challenge: all these people are now locked away without the ability to fend for themselves. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 1:44 am
There have been a number of IPBiz posts, including but not limited to:What californiastemcellreport isn't talking abouthttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/01/note-to-californiastemcellreport.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/06/response-to-californiastemcellreport-on.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/08/sacramento-bee-article-on-act-stem.html [Of this 2006 post, note the supposed"breakthrough" went nowhere AND was irrelevant to weakening WARF's (supposed) lock on research]… [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 3:22 pm by Thomas Berg and Douglas Laycock
The court largely confines the approval of funding denials that was given in Locke v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Kelly
(Michael Geist) United States US General Motorola and Huawei lawsuit re trade secret theft (Tangible IP) US Patents Is it ‘spare time’ if your employer owns your work? [read post]