Search for: "State v Richards"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 8,993
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2010, 11:00 am
As sports law historians will remember, there is some precedent on the issue of gender eligibility in sports - Renee Richards v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 1:47 pm
It gave rise to this a recent opinion by Judge Richard Leon, Smoking Everywhere, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The following contribution to our VRA symposium comes from Richard L. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:15 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 5:38 pm
Sharon Shakargy, Marriage by the State or Married to the State? [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 3:28 am
Marriage by the State or Married to the State? [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
At Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the legislature’s brief in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:16 am
The court’s unanimous ruling Tuesday in Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 7:09 am
Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 11:02 am
In Fazaga v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:01 am
Richard Burr's proposal to reauthorize the expiring authorities. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
With all due respect, the piece by Justice Stephen Markman of the Michigan Supreme Court seems to fit the bill this time, and it is very effectively eviscerated by Richard Primus. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re argues that, if the Court were once again to grant review in Fisher v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:25 am
United States (here, with Gabriel Lather) and Hickenlooper v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
As in the United States, pre-merger integration, coordination and/or information sharing is an important antitrust issue under Canada's Competition Act. [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:12 am
On May 15, 2017, in State of Hawaii v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
In Forbes, University of Chicago law professor Richard Epstein discusses two cases – Alvarez v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:03 am
At the urging of the liberal press (especially the New York Times), he was appointed to look into a run-of-the-mill leak and wound up prosecuting not the leaker -- Richard Armitage of the State Department -- but Libby, convicted in the end of lying. [read post]
