Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 6:06 pm
The Administration’s appeal to the courts could also backfire. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
Unfortunately, the kind of GPSfeatured in this summary doesnot come with detailed maps State v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:42 am
In Venture, the Court stated, “the provisions of Part I of the Act would apply to all arbitrations including international commercial arbitrations and to hold that where such arbitration is held in India, the provisions of Part-I would compulsorily extent permitted by the provisions of Part-I. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
SL v Westminster City Council & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 954 This is a significant judgment by the Court of Appeal on the ambit of s.21(1)(a) National Assistance Act 1948. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
SL v Westminster City Council & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 954 This is a significant judgment by the Court of Appeal on the ambit of s.21(1)(a) National Assistance Act 1948. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit concluded that this provision did not unambiguously waive sovereign immunity. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
Indeed, the very definition of Promote states that it is “determined under Sections 6.1 (a)(iii)-(v). [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
In the Ninth Circuit appeal of the Epic Games v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 2:00 am
In 2012, I blogged on the reported Clark v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 12:24 am
Smartphone Purchasers v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:01 am
Here are the facts of State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 5:13 pm
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department utilized the same standard of review in Able v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Therefore, this case presents one of the most common scenarios in which the Supreme Court is likely to grant review: a division among the federal courts of appeals, also known as circuits. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
It's only fitting, then, that I refer to what happened in the recently decided case, Cooperstown Capital, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
The City appealed.Referring to Matter of City of Plattsburgh [Plattsburgh Permanent Firemen's Assn.], ___ AD3d ___ [appeal No. 527791, decided herewith**], the Appellate Division said as it had noted in appeal No. 527791, the parties had entered into a MOA that supplements the provisions of the CBA that it had determined constitute a job security clause.Accordingly, the court opined that the MOA is not arbitrable for the reasons it set forth in its… [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
No, said the EUIPO’s Opposition Division. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:00 am
The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, affirmed that order. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
As was recently reported on this blog, in September the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit entered an important decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Last week the judges of the New York Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the Appellate Division, First Department's interlocutory order in Roni LLC v. [read post]
