Search for: "State v. D. H." Results 2481 - 2500 of 3,857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
” Recognizing that the Sherman Act could be read to bar all contracts, federal courts for over a century have interpreted the 1890 antitrust law only to apply to “unreasonable” restraints of trade.[7] The Supreme Court first adopted this concept in its landmark 1911 decision in Standard Oil, upholding the lower court’s dissolution of John D. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:53 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Cet évènement a pour objectif d’alimenter un débat dans une optique mondiale, détachée du cadre national. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
In one, a split panel held that that applicant’s claim for psychiatric injury stemming from defendant’s denial of her request for exemption from its COVID-19 vaccination requirement was not barred by the Labor Code § 3208.3(h) good faith personnel action defense. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 4:46 am
Koski, State Public Defender; Donna D. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
”               CPLR 2305(d) provides as follows:(d) Subpoena duces tecum for a trial; service of subpoena and delivery for records. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
”               CPLR 2305(d) provides as follows:(d) Subpoena duces tecum for a trial; service of subpoena and delivery for records. [read post]