Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 27,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
On December 1, 2015 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:50 am
In Kitts v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:11 am
In so doing, the court admitting that it was disagreeing with another federal district court in that state, Cordy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:12 am
In Bourff v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 5:03 am
Caruso v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 11:29 am
In Edward Mullins et al v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
This iterative process continued in countries like India and China, each factory adding its own interpretation and modifications along the way.[17] Wiesner stated, “One thing we’re always so amazed by is the creativity that comes out of the half of the process when producing an object [in a factory]. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:03 am
The Court carefully considered the guidance from Work v Gray [2017] EWCA Civ 270, setting out how to assess this concept. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am
The last phrase of this rule was the part that gave Justice Sam Alito pause in his concurring opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:25 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School Professor and champion of a less copyright-restricted Internet, last month joined forces with the Electronic Frontier Foundation to file suit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against a Melbourne, Australia-based record company that accused the professor of infringing on a copyrighted song by using it in a lecture presented on YouTube.In his 11-page complaint, Lessig v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 10:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:31 pm
In Pearson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:04 am
The United States Supreme Court has frequently noted the importance of the IDEA procedural safeguards, finding them to be at the heart of the fairness of the process, the great equalizer. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:04 am
The United States Supreme Court has frequently noted the importance of the IDEA procedural safeguards, finding them to be at the heart of the fairness of the process, the great equalizer. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:56 am
As noted here, in a 2009 opinion in Katz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Napue v People of State of Illinois, 360 US 264; Pyle v State of Kansas, 317 US 213; cf. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
United States, and City of Boerne v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 10:44 am
Last week, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of an Indiana trial court judge's right to refuse a defendant's request for self-representation, stating that the mental capacity of the defendant could compromise his competency and right to a fair trial.In Indiana v. [read post]
