Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 5,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
City of San Diego, et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm
” Judge Rakoff also rejected the argument that the allegedly misleading statements about the company’s business and management were mere “opinion” or “puffery,” stating that “where (as here alleged) the statements were made repeatedly in an effort to reassure the investing public about the Company’s integrity, a reasonable investor could rely on them as reflective of the true state of affairs at the company. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:05 pm
" PICCO, 411 U.S. at 674; United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:41 am
The case is Sugartown Worldwide LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:37 pm
To quote the lead opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 2:59 am
Brown v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
If a business sponsored a health plan that violated the ACA claims and appeals rules or any other health plan rule subject to the Form 8928 filing requirement in 2014 or thereafter, the business should take prompt, well-documented actions to self-correct the violation or timely must file the required Form 8929 and pay the applicable $100 per violation per day excise tax since proof of good faith efforts to maintain compliance, proof of self-correction, or both… [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
Farm employers are not subject to many federal labor laws and, in many states, are not included within the scope of the state workers' compensation provisions. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In 2014, for example, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance held that a claimant whose name was often paired with ‘triad member’ in Autocomplete had a good arguable case of defamation to proceed with and dismissed a claim of summary dismissal application made by Google in Dr Yeung Sau Shing Albert v Google Inc (hereinafter referred to as Yeung v Google). [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm
Q: Garcia v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
No late eighteenth century constitutional thinker would be surprised that a future Handbook of the United States Constitution included essays on liberty, property, religion, free expression and free press, criminal procedure, habeas corpus, and the right to bear arms. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 12:06 pm
, Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:52 am
In Walton v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
” Right to bear arms. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 8:59 am
That still sounds a good idea to me. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
If the prosecution has evidence bearing on the crime with which a defendant is being charged, it must promptly turn it over to the defense. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
However TOP Logistics, in providing a warehouse service for goods bearing another’s trade mark, did not 'use a sign identical to that trade mark for goods or services identical or similar to those in respect of which the mark is registered'.* Accordingly, Article 5 must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark registered in one or more Member States may oppose a third party placing goods bearing that trade… [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:49 am
In January 2011, Coty bought a bottle of perfume bearing the trade mark DAVIDOFF HOT WATER from an internet auction platform, paying the purchase price into the seller's bank with the Stadtsparkasse. [read post]
