Search for: "State v. Howes"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 72,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:02 pm
But on Monday, in the space of an hour, Kennedy saw the case of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
In Padidham v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 12:45 pm
Ray McKoski (The John Marshall Law School) has posted Judicial Disqualification after Caperton v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:11 am
This post is a (very brief) sequel to my previous post on how the Australian High Court’s decision in Cole v Whitfield could bear upon Indian jurisprudence on restraints on interstate trade and commerce. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 3:18 pm
This post is a (very brief) sequel to my previous post on how the Australian High Court’s decision in Cole v Whitfield could bear upon Indian jurisprudence on restraints on interstate trade and commerce. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Cupek v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 am
In Tapia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:45 am
Last night we filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 12:15 am
JCCrandall, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 5:21 pm
And the 38 page decision in Board of County Commissioners of Washington County v. [read post]
22 Oct 2006, 6:44 am
I'll do my best to summarize each case in clear, non-legal jargon (where possible; where it's not, I'll explain legal language or provide a link) and then give my critique of how the decision affects the law. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:17 am
In regards to the ground that the respondent’s decision was disproportionate under EU law, the CJEU judgment in Rottman did not state explicitly that a Member State’s decision as to the acquisition or loss of national citizenship was outside the scope of EU law. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:51 am
The post ACS v. [read post]
