Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 36,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
”Case of the Day: Seijas v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:51 am
These states developments offer a powerful counter-paradigm to that of the U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:40 pm
This was in fact stated by the tribunal Burlington v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
United States, 481 US 412 (1987). [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:44 pm
The CSAPR sets limits on sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides from power plants in 28 upwind states in the eastern part of the country. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:00 pm
Congress doesn’t have the power to regulate speech; it never delegated that. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:31 pm
Here is the abstract: In the recently decided United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:16 pm
As for Harris v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 5:57 am
OF REVENUE v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:58 am
Twitter * Second Circuit Issues Powerful Section 230 Win to Facebook in “Material Support for Terrorists” Case–Force v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:21 am
The Constitution constrains states from excessively burdening out-of-state commerce – a doctrine known as the dormant commerce clause, because it is implicit in the grant of power to Congress to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 11:43 am
In “The Unfinished Story of Roe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:41 pm
Factual Background The case – Glacier Northwest Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
Roberts states the doctrine in the one-line form that Chief Justice Rehnquist used in Nixon v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:10 am
Constitution, perhaps most famously in the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8): "Congress shall have the power to regulate Commerce with foreign nations and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
With these questions in mind, the analysis devotes special attention to the first case in which the Supreme Court struck down a state law under the Supremacy Clause: Ware v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:06 am
Goodyear v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
The Lord Ordinary had erred in finding that the 2003 Act was the source of the respondents’ power to prohibit smoking. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Southerners from John Randolph to James Madison objected to the apparently broad definition of federal power in McCulloch and Gibbon v. [read post]
