Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 40,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2010, 10:03 am
State of Punjab [AIR 2001 SC 2828], this Court held that the word ‘dowry’ should be any property or valuable given or agreed to be given in connection with the marriage. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:47 am
On Friday, a federal judge rejected a challenge to Michigan State's vaccine mandate. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:08 pm
Justice Elena Kagan made the same point in her opinion last year in Michigan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Id., at 829 (quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
Wallace, United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 8:04 am
Luxshare, Ltd. and Alixpartners, LLP, et al., v. the Fund for Protection of Investor’s Rights in Foreign States. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 7:32 am
The post More Perspectives About Van Buren v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Taking into consideration the cases of A v United Kingdom (3455/05) (2009) 49 EHRR 29 ECHR (Grand Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74, the claimants’ arguments on this point were upheld. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:37 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 2:11 pm
In ABS Global, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:15 am
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In other words, the efficiency analysis was only one step required of the Commission. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:35 pm
Simpson, 2008 SCC 40, and Grant v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:44 am
Michael: I was in trouble like three words into that.You smile. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b) Australian… [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:29 am
In line with the mandate of this blog (which reproduces the words of HM Seervai), as noted at the top of this page, this post along with subsequent posts critically appraises the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Hindustan Construction Company v UoI (pdf)(2019: SC).Readers of this blog, we are sure, would have read the decision. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:21 pm
L. art. 5 (2006), available at http://www.bepress.com/jtl/vol1/iss1/art5/ (link).It's nice to see him make it again, particularly with Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:01 am
In other words, the CLRA's standing requirement remains less strict than the UCL's. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 3:01 pm
Omar -v- Birmingham City Council 2007. (7 June 2007. [read post]
